Waterschap Brabantse Delta · R&D lab · research artifact
Title: what was investigated and what came out of it
Team/author
first version YYYY-MM-DD
last updated YYYY-MM-DD
version 1.0
draft
One paragraph: question, approach, main finding, and what WBD can do with it.
Key result 1 — with the number and the unit.
Key result 2 — and the limitation that comes with it.
Motivation & question
Why this study; which decision depends on it.[1]
Data & method
Which data (measurement points/tags, period, resolution), how it was pulled (source
path, query or MCP tool + retrieval date), which processing steps, which tooling.
assumption State every assumption
explicitly here and why it is reasonable — this is the audit trail.
Results
Describe what the figure shows, over which period, and what the reader
should take from it. Name the data source briefly.
What the table is about and how to read it.
row value unit
example 1.23 GWh
Discussion & limitations
What the result does and does not say; sensitivities; what a next step would be.
Sources
Source name , title/description, publisher. link ↗
consulted YYYY-MM-DD
Data vintage Z-info through YYYY-MM · KNMI YYYY · MCP calls on YYYY-MM-DD
Method short characterisation (e.g. regression over annual totals)
Tooling e.g. SQLite (dataset in sidecar .js) · zinfo MCP · Plotly
Code & reproducibility repo/path or "in this file (view-source)"
Contact R&D lab · lab.wbd-rd.nl