Waterschap Brabantse Delta · R&D lab · research artifact

Title: what was investigated and what came out of it

Team/author first version YYYY-MM-DD last updated YYYY-MM-DD version 1.0 draft
One paragraph: question, approach, main finding, and what WBD can do with it.

Motivation & question

Why this study; which decision depends on it.[1]

Data & method

Which data (measurement points/tags, period, resolution), how it was pulled (source path, query or MCP tool + retrieval date), which processing steps, which tooling.

assumption State every assumption explicitly here and why it is reasonable — this is the audit trail.

E= Q·ρ·g·H η
Eshaft power drawnWcomputed
Qflow ratem³/sZ-info, tag …[1]
ρwater densitykg/m³constant, 998 at 20 °C
ggravitational accelerationm/s²constant, 9.81
Hheadmlegger/design[1]
ηefficiencyassumption supplier curve

Results

Describe what the figure shows, over which period, and what the reader should take from it. Name the data source briefly.
What the table is about and how to read it.
rowvalueunit
example1.23GWh

Discussion & limitations

What the result does and does not say; sensitivities; what a next step would be.

Sources

  1. Source name, title/description, publisher. link ↗ consulted YYYY-MM-DD
Data vintage Z-info through YYYY-MM · KNMI YYYY · MCP calls on YYYY-MM-DD
Method short characterisation (e.g. regression over annual totals)
Tooling e.g. SQLite (dataset in sidecar .js) · zinfo MCP · Plotly
Code & reproducibility repo/path or "in this file (view-source)"
Contact R&D lab · lab.wbd-rd.nl