Files
generalFunctions/datasets/assetData/curves/aerostrip-phoenix.json

45 lines
2.8 KiB
JSON
Raw Normal View History

feat(registry): AssetResolver + diffuser supplier curves (Jäger / Aerostrip / PIK / PRK) Two related changes bundled together because the diffuser curve files only make sense once the registry namespace they live in exists. src/registry — new asset-metadata resolver: - AssetResolver with synchronous resolve(namespace, id) + lazy cache, async refresh() for future remote pulls. - FileBackend (per-id or single-file layouts, case-insensitive) and a stub HttpBackend (disabled unless EVOLV_ASSET_REMOTE=1). - Namespaces: curves, menu, monsterSamples, monsterSpecs, units. Menu namespace re-keys by inner softwareType + filename so editors that pass either string resolve to the same tree. - README explains how to add a namespace. - AssetCategoryManager (datasets/assetData/index.js) becomes a thin facade over the resolver so existing consumers don't move. - 246/246 tests pass — including the 39-test registry suite. datasets/assetData — file moves + new diffuser data: - modelData/*.json deleted; curves/*.json is the canonical home. - New diffuser.json menu tree with GVA, Jäger, Aquaconsult/Entec, PIK/PRK suppliers. - gva-elastox-r.json migrated from the inline _loadSpecs hardcode, re-tagged coverageBasis="bottom-coverage-pct" (the legacy 2.4 elements/m² was a prior mis-conversion; we can't recover the original % so it's a single-point curve under key "0"). - jaeger-jetflex-td-65-2-g-epdm-1000.json — extracted from the Jäger EPDM-1000mm SSOTE/DWP chart on the data sheet (vector-PDF read). SSOTE 8.20→6.40 %/m, DWP 25→48 mbar across Q 2-12 Nm³/h. Single coverage (vendor doesn't state test conditions). - aerostrip-phoenix.json — 4-coverage SOTE family at 4.75 m water depth (DD 5/10/15/20 %, flux 10-70 Nm³/h·m²) from the Entec/de Winter 2023-11-22 dataset; DWP curve from the 21 % @ 4.05 m chart. - pik300.json / prk300.json — 5-coverage SOTE + SSOTR (DD 5-25 %) with split DWP per model variant, water depth ≈ 4.0 m inferred from the SOTE↔SSOTR ratio in the source spreadsheet. src/configs/diffuser.json: - New asset.{model, assetTagNumber} block so the editor's selected model id survives validation. - diffuser.density description corrected to "Bottom coverage [%]"; default 2.4 → 15 (typical fine-bubble install). src/configs/{rotatingMachine,valve}.json: small alignment edits that came with the registry phase. src/menu/asset.js + src/menu/aquonSamples.js: rewritten as facades over assetResolver, keeping the editor-side cascade behaviour intact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 17:12:13 +02:00
{
"_meta": {
"supplier": "Aquaconsult Anlagenbau / Entec",
"type": "Strip",
"model": "AEROSTRIP",
"membrane": "PHOENIX",
"stdAir": { "temp_C": 0, "pressure_mbar": 1013.25, "RH_pct": 0 },
"coverageBasis": "bottom-coverage-pct",
"coverageReference": [5, 10, 15, 20],
"dataQuality": "multi-coverage",
"xAxisBasis": "per-m2-membrane-Nm3h",
"yAxisBasis": "ssotr-g-per-Nm3-per-m",
"waterDepth_m": 4.75,
"sources": [
"Floris de Winter (Entec Holland) email to R. de Ren on 2023-11-22 — tabulated SOTE [%] at 4.75 m water depth for bottom coverage 5/10/15/20 % at fluxes 10/25/40/55/70 Nm3/(h*m2 membrane). Original chart in 'SSOTE_4.75m different density.pdf'.",
"'SSOTR_dP.pdf' — AEROSTRIP fine-bubble diffuser SSOTR + Druckverlust (DWP) chart at water depth 4.05 m, blow-in depth 4.00 m, 21 % bottom coverage. Used for the DWP curve only (read off the vector chart)."
],
"note": "X-axis is flux per m² of membrane area, NOT per element. The existing diffuser specificClass passes `flow_per_element` to the interpolator — if you wire an AEROSTRIP model in, you must either set elements/area such that flow_per_element == flux_per_m2_membrane, OR extend _calcOtrPressure to apply the membrane-area conversion. SSOTR values are SOTE [%] / water_depth_m * 0.299 kg-O2/Nm3 * 10 (linear depth scaling). DWP curve was measured at 21 % bottom coverage; pressure loss is intrinsic to the diffuser geometry so the curve is shared across coverage values."
},
"sote_curve": {
"5": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [34.20, 28.75, 26.16, 24.89, 24.19] },
"10": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [42.01, 35.32, 32.14, 30.58, 29.71] },
"15": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [43.39, 36.48, 33.20, 31.59, 30.69] },
"20": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [43.80, 36.82, 33.51, 31.88, 30.97] }
},
"ssote_curve": {
"5": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [7.20, 6.05, 5.51, 5.24, 5.09] },
"10": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [8.84, 7.44, 6.77, 6.44, 6.26] },
"15": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [9.14, 7.68, 6.99, 6.65, 6.46] },
"20": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [9.22, 7.75, 7.06, 6.71, 6.52] }
},
"otr_curve": {
"5": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [21.53, 18.10, 16.47, 15.67, 15.23] },
"10": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [26.44, 22.23, 20.23, 19.25, 18.70] },
"15": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [27.31, 22.96, 20.90, 19.89, 19.32] },
"20": { "x": [10, 25, 40, 55, 70], "y": [27.57, 23.18, 21.10, 20.06, 19.49] }
},
"p_curve": {
"21": {
"x": [5, 10, 25, 40, 55, 70, 80],
"y": [46.0, 47.3, 51.1, 54.9, 58.7, 62.4, 65.0]
}
}
}