RnD/EVOLV

Files

znetsixe d4e72f280e docs: retire repo-mem MCP, migrate skills to .claude/skills, audit fixes

- Delete .mcp.json + .claude/rules/repo-mem.md; drop .repo-mem from .gitignore
- Remove repo-mem / substrate_score / repo_search references from all .md
- Move 15 EVOLV skills from .agents/skills/ to .claude/skills/ so they are
  auto-discovered by the Claude Code harness and invokable via the Skill tool
- Retire .agents/skills/evolv-orchestrator (duplicate of the subagent at
  .claude/agents/evolv-orchestrator.md); orchestrator lives as a subagent only
- Drop OpenAI-format agent yaml metadata from each skill (not needed for CC)
- Update CLAUDE.md, CONTRACTS.md, AGENTS.md to point at the new locations and
  disambiguate skills (.claude/skills/) vs subagents (.claude/agents/)
- Fix CLAUDE.md tick-loop wording (opt-in per-node, not a fixed 1000ms)
- Widen .claude/rules/ paths frontmatter so node-architecture and telemetry
  rules trigger on more relevant files; add frontmatter to flow-layout rule
- Bump CONTRACTS.md review date to 2026-05-19; add step 7 to the contract-
  change workflow (review example flows when topic usage changes)
- Bump nodes/generalFunctions pin (Home.md substrate_score reference removed)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-05-19 09:30:49 +02:00

2.2 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

name, description

name	description
evolv-regulatory-compliance-wastewater	Apply wastewater regulatory and compliance constraints to EVOLV control and telemetry design. Use when reviewing effluent-quality KPIs, reporting semantics, auditability, traceability of control actions, and compliance-impacting alarm/control decisions.

EVOLV Regulatory Compliance Wastewater

Mission

Ensure EVOLV changes remain auditable and aligned with wastewater compliance/reporting obligations.

Harness Execution Contract

Map compliance-relevant outputs and control decisions from current repo contracts.
Define invariants before edits:
- compliance KPIs remain traceable
- auditability of major control actions is preserved
- reporting semantics are stable or explicitly migrated
Validate with evidence that supports audit/review workflows.

Scope

Effluent-related outputs and quality calculations in process nodes
Alarm and control behaviors that affect permit-critical operation
Telemetry/reporting contracts consumed by dashboards/reports

Workflow

Identify compliance-relevant metrics and events.
Trace data lineage from sensor/input to reported output.
Verify timestamp/quality metadata sufficiency for audits.
Review alarm/control actions that can affect permit outcomes.
Define documentation and test evidence for compliance-critical paths.

Standards

Prefer explicit semantics over inferred compliance logic.
Preserve historical comparability of compliance KPIs.
Ensure traceability of overrides, trips, and degraded operation.
Keep evidence artifacts reproducible and review-friendly.

Test Expectations

Cover:

compliance KPI payload consistency
traceability fields presence (timestamp/source/quality where applicable)
alarm/control transitions relevant to permit risk
behavior under missing or suspect compliance measurements

Deliverables

Return:

compliance impact map and assumptions
changed files/tests with audit-focused evidence
unresolved compliance risks and mitigation recommendations

Decision interview triggers:

any change that can alter reported compliance values
changed retention/backfill semantics for compliance reporting
reduced auditability or traceability in control/telemetry paths

2.2 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History