Files
EVOLV/.claude/skills/evolv-instrumentation-assets/SKILL.md

56 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2026-02-12 10:48:20 +01:00
---
name: evolv-instrumentation-assets
description: Engineer measurement and instrumentation behavior for EVOLV assets. Use when defining sensor mappings, tag semantics, data quality checks, measurement container behavior, calibration assumptions, and measurement-driven node logic in `measurement` and related assets.
---
# EVOLV Instrumentation Assets
## Mission
Ensure measurements are trustworthy, well-modeled, and usable by control and analytics logic.
## Harness Execution Contract
- Ground changes in current measurement definitions and downstream consumers.
- Define invariants before edits:
- unit consistency and conversion transparency
- explicit quality-state handling
- no silent coercion that hides sensor faults
- Provide evidence for data-quality transitions and fallback behavior.
2026-02-12 10:48:20 +01:00
## Scope
- `nodes/measurement/`
- `nodes/generalFunctions/src/helper/measurement*`
- `nodes/generalFunctions/datasets/assetData/measurement.json`
- Any node consuming measurement topics or quality flags
## Workflow
1. Inventory required measurements by asset/function.
2. Define tag semantics and expected units.
3. Add validation rules for bounds, type, and missing values.
4. Specify handling for stale/noisy/bad-quality signals.
5. Ensure downstream nodes receive consistent payload structure.
## Standards
- Prefer explicit unit naming and conversion points.
- Separate raw sensor value from engineered value when possible.
- Avoid hidden coercions that mask instrumentation faults.
- Record assumptions around calibration and sensor placement.
## Test Expectations
Cover:
- missing/invalid payloads
- unit conversion correctness
- quality/state transitions (good/suspect/bad)
- behavior when critical measurements drop out
## Deliverables
Return:
- measurement dictionary (name, unit, validity range, source)
- validation and fallback rules
- file/test changes
- open instrumentation risks for commissioning
Decision interview triggers:
- changed units or semantics for released measurements
- new fallback logic that may mask real field failures
- altered quality thresholds affecting control decisions